Trainee lawyer’s courtroom crusade comes crashing down

A trainee lawyer who has been on a relentless, six-year revenge campaign against a boutique firm was hit with a vexatious order.

In addition to being a burden to the High Court, the Federal Court, and the Supreme Court, Prateek Patial’s bitter battle with Kailash Lawyers has been full of “highly scandalous” allegations, irrelevant submissions, hopeless arguments, and abuse of process.

In at least 17 published decisions in the firm’s favour, Patial unsuccessfully claimed his time spent at Kailash Lawyers for supervised legal training in mid-2020 counted as employment and permitted him to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

His brief training came to a dramatic end when police were called to escort him from the firm’s premises in August 2020.

The Federal Court’s Justice Scott Goodman said he was left with no choice but to make a vexatious proceedings order against Patial, preventing him from bringing further proceedings against Kailash Lawyers or other potential parties he may want to target in future.

“In this case … the drain on public resources as a result of Patial’s repeated forays in this court (and the Commission) has been significant and it is inappropriate to allow Patial to continue to litigate in the manner that he has to date, without the prior leave of the court,” Justice Goodman said in his recently published decision.

In a number of previous judgments from both the Federal Court and other Australian courts, Patial was held to have engaged in abuse of process. It included filing an application in the High Court for leave to file an application for a constitutional or other writ.

He has also been found to have engaged in vexatious conduct.

Judicial officers have frequently been critical of Patrial, including that he has pursued his claims “in notably vitriolic ways” and made scandalous, unsubstantiated and “inexcusable” allegations.

Those allegations include that Kailash Lawyers’ representatives bribed a Fair Work commissioner, colluded with her, committed perjury, tampered with evidence, and “deployed their race” for advantage.

Patial also alleged the Fair Work commissioner was “corrupt, racist, biased and a ‘Nazi’”. Each of these allegations was denounced by the courts in the strongest possible terms.

“Taking all of these matters into account, I am comfortably satisfied that Patial has conducted proceedings in a manner that satisfies the definition of ‘vexatious proceeding’,” Justice Goodman said.

Citation: Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants v Patial [2026] FCA 1403.

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make HR Leader a preferred news source on Google.