Ban on casual loading 'will mean pay cuts for thousands'

“Given the Albanese government want to increase security of employment and deliver higher rates of pay, why in the world would they propose law that would prohibit the combination of higher pay and predictable work?” he said.

“How can a government be so blind to how people want to work in 2023?

The RCSA said only about 4 per cent of those employed as casuals had chosen to convert to permanent roles when given the opportunity. Workers preferred to stay casual for its greater flexibility and higher rate of pay.

“Employers will need to direct employees to choose permanent employment in lieu of casual employment, regardless of what the worker wants, and what suits them and their families,” Mr Cameron said.

“This will result in a 20 per cent reduction in the rate of pay for thousands. The other option is to kill the job off entirely.

“If an employer agrees to a request for casual work with predicable hours of work, they risk fines and prosecution.”

The RCSA said casual workers and employers were happy with the current arrangement, which offered a path to permanent work for those who wanted it.

“The government need to put regular Australians ahead of union mates,” Mr Cameron said.

“This bill will create a huge new problem for casual workers. It will either strip them of pay or strip them of stability, which is a bad outcome for people who prefer higher-paid casual work.

“Australian workers did not ask the Albanese government to insert itself into personal decisions around how they choose to live and work. This is so disrespectful.

“Removing the option to work casually and docking your pay by 20 per cent for the privilege is gross overreach.

“This bill is about delivering on promises to unions. Australian workers and businesses are merely collateral damage in the process.”

This article was originally published on HR Leader's sister brand, Accountants Daily.